Let’s do this.

Records · Evidence review

Impact review: what the trafficking pages ask one person to do, and what the evidence says

The working record behind the pages, published as written. Source file source/impact/trafficking-2026-11-05.md. All records.

Reviewed 2026-11-05. Pages reviewed: content/trafficking-do.html, content/trafficking-practice.html, content/trafficking-learn.html; prior research source/research/trafficking.md. Nothing on the content pages was edited. This file is the review; Isaac decides what changes.

0. How to read this

The decision. Which actions the Do and Practice pages should recommend, in what order, and which organisations they should name, given the best evidence available today about what one person (no special position, a few hours a month, a modest budget) can do that reduces trafficking and forced labour or helps the people caught in it. Isaac decides; this review grades the evidence and recommends.

Grades on sources (every source below carries one):

Fetch date for everything is 2026-11-05 unless stated. Where a fetch failed, the file says so and names the route used instead.

Grades on actions (fixed before the evidence was read):

What this review could not reach today. The shared web-search budget ran out part-way through; after that only known URLs were fetched. Blocked or rate-limited: acf.gov for the fetch tool (the awareness agent obtained the award release and the hotline data page by direct download), grassley.senate.gov (the December 2025 letter to Compass Connections and the May 2025 floor remarks), ijm.org, the Freedom Fund's northern-India evaluation PDF and IDS OpenDocs, nswp.org (Empower's Hit and Run), ucpress.edu, PubMed (cookie wall; Europe PMC and Crossref used instead), the CBP UFLPA dashboard (interactive, no text), USDA's FLSP page, Open Philanthropy (now redirecting to coefficientgiving.org, 403). The Wayback Machine is refused by the fetch tool; two archived hotline pages were pulled with curl and compared locally. Two research strands (organisation checks; awareness and hotline evidence) were run by subagents; their findings are marked [agent] and were spot-checked where they bear weight. Anything marked unread has not been opened by anyone in this session.

Headline. The pages are already more honest than most of the field. Three things should change. (1) "Learn the signs" as public stranger-spotting has no outcome evidence anywhere in the literature and a documented harm record; the version with any plausible value is knowing the labour signs for people you already know. (2) The hotline is first a service for the person in the situation; as a third-party tip channel the only outcome data are HHS's counts of situations passed to law enforcement (3,643 of 13,623 potential situations in FY2025) and Polaris's claim that 71% of referrals with a known outcome led to an investigation (denominator unpublished); the federal evaluation found the hotline "has no influence on whether law enforcement takes additional action". Whether tips should go to police without consent is a live political fight (41 attorneys general and HHS on one side, survivor-led groups and the hotline's own confidentiality policy on the other). (3) The strongest independent endorsement in the whole supply-chain space goes to worker-driven enforcement (the Fair Food Program model), but the "buy Fair Food tomatoes" instruction is nearly unactionable because the label is scarce; the actionable version is supporting the programme and asking retailers to join. Recovery funding stays first and gets a stronger reason in 2026: federal victim-service grants lapsed and T-visa approvals fell by almost two-thirds while applications more than doubled. Two organisation flags: GEMS's FY2023 audit carried going-concern doubt and its leadership changed in 2024 (list it with a caveat), and the hotline is now run by Compass Connections, a federal child-shelter contractor with negative net assets and a two-star rating that has not yet published how it will share tips (say who runs it).

---

A. Action by action

A1. Learn the signs (public "spot the signs")

What the pages say. Do page step 2 and the "signs" section; Practice page drill; the Learn page's framing that most people won't recognise it from a stranger.

Evidence that awareness or "signs" knowledge leads to identified victims or less trafficking.

Harm record of public spotting. Flight-crew or passenger "trafficking" reports led police to meet a white father and his adopted Asian daughter (Southwest, December 2017; the airline apologised and said attendants "receive training" on trafficking indicators) [S12] news; a white mother and her Black 10-year-old (Southwest, November 2021; two Denver officers at the gate) [S13] news; a Black 21-year-old and her white adoptive 4-year-old sister (Frontier, about 2021; two DFW officers questioned the child; Frontier: "Race played no part") [S14] news. The Practice page's nail-salon drill already warns about ethnicity-based reports; the airline cases show the same failure in trained staff.

Grade: weak as public awareness (no outcome evidence in any review; documented misidentification); none-but-plausible for the narrow version the pages already lean toward: knowing the labour signs (recruiter fee, debt, held documents, visa tied to the employer) for people you already know, and knowing what the hotline does and does not do.

Recommendation. Keep the signs, but reorder: labour signs first, "around a person" second, and cut any sign that is really a demographic (language, living above the shop). Replace "Learn the signs that matter" with "Know what a bad job looks like" and add the recruiter-check tool Contratados (reviews of recruiters and employers, run by Centro de los Derechos del Migrante; no usage figures or evaluation published) [S15] programme's own.

A2. Save the number; call or text the National Human Trafficking Hotline

What the pages say. Step 1, the notice box, "How to report", "What happens after you call", the operator-change warning, the drill.

What the hotline is for, in its own words. "Trained Anti-Trafficking Hotline Advocates and supervisory staff provide assistance to victims in crisis"; next steps can include "report to our designated law enforcement partners for investigation"; "Except in situations involving potential abuse of a minor or if we believe a person is in imminent danger, the Trafficking Hotline will not take action without the consent of the person in the situation"; "Decisions to report tips to law enforcement are handled on a case-by-case basis with priority on safety and the consent of the individual involved." [S16] primary. FAQs: "Every case received through the Hotline, email, or online tip report is individually reviewed and evaluated by a Supervisor"; "If a case is reported to law enforcement, the Trafficking Hotline cannot provide updates on the status of the case." [S17] primary. Polaris's own report describes it as existing "first and foremost to assist victims of human trafficking … Data collection is secondary." [S18] charity's own

Did the rules change with the operator? No, on the published text. The confidentiality policy and the "When you reach us" page fetched today (operator: Compass Connections) are word-for-word the same as the archived Polaris-era copies (Wayback snapshots 25 Apr 2025 and 20 Mar 2025, pulled with curl). Two things did change in the footer: funding went from "$5 million annually with 71% … funded by ACF/HHS and $2.06 million and 29% … by non-government sources" to "$7 million annually"; and the 2025 snapshots carried a banner: "We are currently receiving a lot of calls and it may take longer than 15 minutes to speak with one of our advocates." [S19, S20] primary (archived) vs [S16, S21] primary (today)

The operator change. HHS award 90ZV0148 to Compass Connections: cooperative agreement, start 30 Sep 2025, end 29 Sep 2030, $14.85M obligated so far from an initial $7M; the funding office is listed as the Office of Refugee Resettlement; the assistance listing shown is 93.604 "Assistance for Torture Victims", which looks like a catalogue mislabel [S22] primary (federal award data via HigherGov). The hotline FAQ says Compass "began operating the Hotline in September 2025" [S17]; Polaris says "all hotline operations" transferred on 8 Dec 2025 and "Polaris no longer holds any operational role" [S23] charity's own. Both are right about different things (award start vs operational handover); the page should say "award from 30 September 2025, handover completed 8 December 2025". Compass Connections' site describes itself as "a federal partner providing National Call Center services 24/7 to children, parents, and sponsors engaged through the US Department of Health and Human Services", lists emergency shelters, foster care and call-centre operations among its programmes, says nothing about law-enforcement cooperation, and links to a BCFS careers site [S24] primary. Who Compass is, what it earns, and its relationship to BCFS are in D2.

What happens to tips, in numbers. HHS/ACF's own data page (fiscal years): FY2025 187,863 signals, 32,458 "substantive", 9,446 from potential victims, 13,623 potential situations; situations reported to law enforcement FY2018–FY2025: 3,434, 3,599, 3,353, 2,889, 2,531, 2,381, 2,642, 3,643 (24,472 in total); 79,487 unique service referrals. So in FY2025 about 27% of potential situations went to law enforcement (3,643 of 13,623); the fiscal-year signal count is a different definition from the hotline's calendar-year 52,664 and should not be reconciled. [S78] primary [agent]. Polaris's own counts: "more than 7,300 situations" referred to law enforcement from 2016 to August 2022 [S83]; "nearly 32,000 reports" since 2007, and "of the law enforcement reports where the Hotline was told the outcome, 71% led to investigations being opened", with the share of reports with a known outcome not given [S88] charity's own [agent]; "at least 46 tips led to active investigations" in one month of 2025 [S79] charity's own [agent]. Keep all three referral counts; they cover different windows. The federal evaluation (RTI International for ACF/OPRE, December 2023; 253,326 contacts 2013–2018, 301 observed calls, staff and survivor focus groups, interviews with receiving police agencies) is the only breakdown of who contacts the hotline: 42.6% of contacts (n=107,916) concerned a specific incident of trafficking, 25.9% an incident "deemed to be high risk", 14.0% a general trafficking-related request, 14.9% a request unrelated to trafficking; among specific-incident contacts the largest contactor group was potential victims themselves (27.4%, n=29,568), who mostly called to give information (38.5%) or get a referral (31.7%), with 29.0% in crisis. It found advocates' "connections to law enforcement are perceived to be less dependable", that the reporting process was explained to only 52.4% (32 of 61) of observed contactors for whom it was relevant, that survivors "believed that law enforcement would respond to their location or that they would receive a callback", and that "once a report is made, the NHTH has no influence on whether law enforcement takes additional action"; it reports no tip outcomes. [S87] primary [agent; re-downloaded and confirmed]. No GAO evaluation of the hotline exists; GAO-26-107901 (11 Jun 2026) only cites the hotline's 2024 totals. [S104] primary [agent]. No independent study tracing tips to substantiation or prosecution was found by anyone in this session.

Why it changed, and the contest over tips.

What a caller can expect in 2026. Supervisor review of every tip; no updates; anonymity protected when a tip is passed on; action without consent only for minors or imminent danger; calls not recorded. [S16, S17, S21]. The page's description is accurate. Its line that the hotline "exists for uncertain tips" (Practice page) is not how the hotline describes itself; it exists for victims first.

Grade: moderate as a resource to give to the person in the situation (the mechanism is a live, consent-based referral service with 10,971 victim contacts in 2025 and 79,487 service referrals over eight fiscal years; the federal evaluation found the referral side the dependable part); weak as a third-party tip line (about a quarter of potential situations go to police; the only investigation-rate figure is Polaris's 71% of an unpublished denominator; the hotline cannot follow up; survivor groups say nonconsensual reporting deters the calls that matter; HHS now requires standardised tip-sharing, so the terms may change).

Recommendation. Keep the number and the save-it step. Reframe the purpose: "a number to give someone" first, "a place for your specific observation" second. Keep the ICE-tipline distinction; add that the hotline is funded by HHS, that every tip is reviewed by a supervisor, that in FY2025 about a quarter of situations were passed to police, and that nobody publishes what happened next. Keep the confidentiality-policy link and the annual re-check, and add the HHS "law enforcement engagement plan" requirement to the stale list: the published rules may change under it.

A3. Other reporting routes: CyberTipline, IC3

Grade. Reporting a scam: moderate for the reporter's own recovery (58% freeze rate when the report is fast); none-but-plausible for reducing the forced labour behind the scams (no evidence that complaint volume changes compound operations; it does feed FBI operations such as "Operation Level Up" named in the report). Keep, worded as money-recovery first.

A4. Pay for recovery, monthly

The evidence on survivor services as a category. Dell et al. 2019 (Trauma, Violence & Abuse), systematic review of exit and post-exit interventions 2005–2015: six eligible studies, 155 women and 6 men, four countries; outcomes included mental health, social networks, reintegration and employment; "most studies were of poor quality"; the evidence is "sparse" while needs are complex and effective interventions "urgently needed". [S32] research. Rothman et al. 2020 (Child Abuse & Neglect), the My Life My Choice survivor-mentor programme: 41 youth aged 11–18, one-group repeated measures; the share with recent commercial sexual exploitation fell from 72% at baseline to 24% at 6 months and 14% at 12 months (p<0.001), with less drug use, delinquency and arrest; follow-up 71% and 68%; no control group. [S33] research. So: the best survivor-service evidence is small, single-group, and positive. That is thinner than the page implies with "the clearest results are in recovery", and the page should say so.

Why recovery funding carries more weight in 2026 than in 2025. Freedom Network USA's March 2026 policy report (author Emma Ecker; 118 member organisations): the 27 January 2025 federal funding pause hit "hundreds of trafficking victim service providers"; in April 2025 DOJ cancelled over 500 grants including two TVPA victim-service grants (restored after a nine-month appeal); on 1 October 2025 "over 100 human trafficking victim services grants ended" and DOJ did not release "$88,000,000 in appropriated funds", "impacting at least 5,000 survivors"; new grants start 1 July 2026; VOCA funds took "an almost 40% cut"; the Deferred Action for Labor Enforcement programme was ended in early 2025; the 2024 H-2A worker-protection rule was rescinded in 2025; automatic work-permit extensions ended in October 2025. [S28] charity's own (coalition report; figures traceable to named federal actions). A federal judge on 23 March 2026 enjoined DOJ's anti-DEI certification conditions on the Services for Victims of Human Trafficking programme (FNUSA v. Trump). [S34] charity's own report of a court order; the opinion itself not read.

T visas. USCIS data queried July 2026 (Form I-914, principals): FY2024 received 15,332, approved 3,786, denied 603, pending 20,351; FY2025 received 37,177, approved 1,398, denied 2,362, pending 45,300; FY2026 through June: received 28,157, approved 496, denied 550, pending 81,695 (122,593 including family members). [S35] primary. Advocates' figures: adjudication averages 28 months as of February 2026, up 47% in a year (FNUSA) [S28]; "around 30.5 months" and rising (Advocates for Human Rights, June 2026) [S36] charity's own. Keep the contest: FNUSA cites a backlog "of over 33,000"; the USCIS sheet shows 81,695 principal applications pending in June 2026. Different dates and definitions; the primary number is USCIS's. On 20 May 2026 a district court in California (ICWC v. Noem) stayed nationwide a 2025 ICE memo "which resulted in the routine arrest, detention, and removal of immigrants with pending VAWA, U visa, and T visa petitions", restoring the 2011 and 2021 victim-centred directives for the certified classes; on 8 May 2026 USCIS described deferred action as "an Extraordinary Use of Prosecutorial Discretion". [S36] charity's own account of court and agency actions; the order itself not read. Twenty-four members of Congress wrote to DHS on 15 January 2026 demanding reinstatement of ICE Directive 11005.3 (protection for pending T/U applicants) and release of detained applicants [S37] primary (congressional release); USCIS told Spectrum News that T-visa applications "exploded from 2,780 in fiscal year 2021 to 23,754 in FY24", which matches the USCIS totals including family members [S38] news.

The named organisations' own outcome reporting.

Grade: moderate for giving to survivor services and legal aid (documented, unmet need; mechanism direct; outcome evidence is the organisations' own or small single-group studies; no independent evaluation of the three NYC groups found). Moderate for the Freedom Fund (strict counting rule; independent prevalence research exists but was not read today). Weak for The Exodus Road and IJM as listed (own figures; model contested; nothing independent read).

Recommendation. Keep recovery first. Add the 2026 reason (federal lapses, T-visa collapse) with the USCIS numbers. Among the NYC three, Restore publishes the most outcome tracking; Sanctuary publishes the broadest service figures and runs immigration legal services; GEMS publishes the least. Say that. Drop the TER/IJM lines or move them to a "what we did not list, and why" note.

A5. The sextortion talk with a teenager

Grade: none-but-plausible, with observational support. The advice on the page (tell them beforehand, don't pay, don't delete, report, Take It Down) matches the FBI's and NCMEC's and fits the survey pattern (paying rarely stops it; shame and fear of punishment stop disclosure); no study tests whether the parental conversation changes outcomes, and the internet-safety-education literature says stand-alone programmes are poorly evidenced. Keep it; keep it short; frame it as part of a wider conversation about online relationships and money, which is what the evidence base supports.

A6. Buy Fair Food Program produce

The programme's own figures (Fair Food Standards Council, 2024 State of the Program, © 2025, covering Season 13, 2023–24): "the Fair Food Program protects over 20,000 farmworkers harvesting dozens of crops across many states and 3 countries, including Chile and South Africa"; legally binding agreements with 14 buyers; more than $50 million in Fair Food Premium paid to workers; 3,919 worker complaints to the programme's hotline, 54% resolved in under two weeks and 73% in under a month; $638,948 in wages recovered through the complaint system; a 10% wage increase from the bucket-filling standard; 27 new growers across 13 new states joining by 2025 under USDA's Farm Labor Stabilization and Protection pilot, which (per the report) made WSR participation the condition of its highest "Platinum" award tier; "by the end of 2025, the FFP will be present on farms in half the states of the continental United States". The report claims the programme's mechanisms "have effectively rid FFP farms of abusive practices, ranging from forced labor and sexual violence to wage theft", and that its training "has effectively eliminated sexual assault and greatly reduced sexual harassment". It contrasts this with forced-labour prosecutions outside the programme: the November 2021 Georgia case ("the largest forced labor prosecution in U.S. history", thousands of H-2A workers, at least two deaths), and later cases in South Carolina and Florida. [S48] programme's own figures. Buyers today: Ahold, Aramark, Bon Appétit, Burger King, Chipotle, Compass Group, The Fresh Market, McDonald's, Sodexo, Subway, Trader Joe's, Walmart, Whole Foods, Yum; Soupergirl as a packaged-goods partner. Buyers "pay a small premium" and "purchase from PGs that are in compliance with the Program's Code of Conduct". [S49] programme's own

Independent views of the mechanism.

Can a shopper act on it? Barely. The label launched in October 2014 on tomatoes at Whole Foods, Giant and Stop & Shop [S55] programme's own. The programme's own consumer page does not tell shoppers to look for a label; it asks them to "use your voice and dollars", propose Fair Food sponsor membership to a co-op board, donate, join the Alliance for Fair Food, buy merchandise or volunteer [S56] programme's own. Wendy's is not named anywhere on the programme site fetched today; the boycott status was not re-verified.

Grade: moderate for supporting worker-driven enforcement (the mechanism is the one independent experts and, in 2021, CBP pointed to; the outcome figures are the programme's own, audited by its own council); weak for the shopping instruction as written (the label is rare, tomato-only, three chains).

Recommendation. Rewrite "Buy Fair Food tomatoes" as "Back the one supply-chain fix with teeth": shop at a participating retailer if there is one near you, ask your grocer or co-op to join, give to CIW/FFSC, and join Alliance for Fair Food actions. Keep the Do page's "Does boycotting do anything?" answer; it is right.

A7. Mentor a young person (BBBS)

Grade: moderate for youth outcomes; none-but-plausible for trafficking prevention. The page already says exactly this. Keep as an optional item.

A8. Scam-compound awareness

Covered under A3. The Learn page's facts on forced criminality rest on the 2024 UNODC report and the 2026 TIP report (fetched earlier today by the previous pass, see source/research/trafficking.md); the FBI's 2025 report independently ties the largest US fraud-loss category to trafficked labour [S31]. Grade: none-but-plausible for any protective effect of awareness; moderate for the money-recovery value of fast reporting.

---

B. The highest-impact things one person can do, ranked

Ranking rule: evidence grade first; where grades tie, the action with the lower harm record and the better fit to a few hours a month ranks higher. "Evidence" here means evidence about the mechanism and the outcome, not about how the action feels.

#ActionGradeOne-line evidence
1Fund survivor legal aid and services monthly (NYC: Sanctuary for Families, Restore NYC; worldwide: the Freedom Fund)moderateNeeds are documented and unmet (Dell 2019 [S32]); 2025–26 federal lapses: $88M unreleased, ≥5,000 survivors affected, VOCA −40% [S28]; T-visa approvals fell from 3,786 (FY2024) to 1,398 (FY2025) while 81,695 principals wait [S35]; Restore tracks 12-month outcomes [S41]; Freedom Fund counts only liberations with follow-up and has independent prevalence research [S43, S45]. Outcome numbers are the organisations' own.
2Back worker-driven enforcement in supply chains (support the Fair Food Program/CIW; ask your grocer or co-op to join; shop at participating retailers where they exist)moderateAudits and certifications are contradicted (Re:Structure Lab 2022 [S52]; CBP 2021 [S50]); WSR is the mechanism independent experts point to (Kiss & Zimmerman 2019 [S2]); programme reports 20,000+ workers, 3,919 complaints resolved, $50M+ premium, and no forced-labour cases on participating farms [S48]. Programme's own outcome figures.
3Be the informed person for the people you know who migrate or take risky jobs: know the labour signs (fee, debt, documents, visa tie), know that the hotline is a consent-based service to give to the person, know Contratados, and never report over an adult's head unless there is immediate dangernone-but-plausible59% of trafficked temporary-visa workers were controlled by immigration threats, so a report that brings immigration enforcement does the trafficker's work [S18]; 20.8% of hotline signals come from victims themselves and the referral side is what the federal evaluation found dependable [S9, S87]; survivor-led groups say consent is what makes the call possible [S26, S27]; pre-departure "awareness" training did not reduce forced labour and its evaluators warn that hotlines "should never be oversold" [S4, S77], so the value is in the specific help, not the general awareness.
4Hold the policy floor: tell your representatives you want TVPA victim-service funds released, T-visa processing restored, the hotline kept consent-based (oppose H.R. 2601-type mandates), and H-2A worker protections restorednone-but-plausibleThe problems are policy-made and dated (FNUSA [S28]; USCIS [S35]; Kamlager-Dove letter [S37]; NAAG vs NSN [S25, S26, S27]); the effectiveness of constituent contact was not reviewed today. Low cost, no harm record.
5If a teenager is in your life: the sextortion conversation, inside a broader talk about online relationships and money; or mentor through BBBS for a full yearnone-but-plausible with observational support (sextortion); moderate for youth outcomes, none for trafficking (mentoring)Finkelhor 2020/21 [S47]; at least 28,000 financial-sextortion cases a year, 90% boys 14–17, paying rarely ends it, and 79% of non-disclosers feared getting in trouble [S100, S103]; IC3 2025: 75,000+ sextortion reports, 11,316 under 20 [S31]; Raposa 2019 [S57]; Rothman 2020 [S33].

What did not make the top five and why. Public "spot the signs" (A1): weak, with harm. Third-party tips to the hotline about strangers (A2): weak; no outcome data. Donations to raid-and-rescue investigators (TER, IJM): weak and contested (see C). Solo boycotts and label-shopping: contradicted as a mechanism (Re:Structure Lab; the page already says so). Reporting scams at IC3: real for your money, unproven for the compounds.

Drop / keep / re-rank for the current pages.

Current itemVerdictReason
Save the hotline in your phone (step 1)keep, re-rank to "the number you give someone"Mechanism is the victim-facing service [S16, S17]; no evidence for third-party spotting; survivor groups' consent position [S26, S27].
Learn the signs (step 2)keep, rewriteLabour signs first; cut demographic cues; rename to "what a bad job looks like"; add Contratados [S15]. Awareness has no outcome evidence [S1, S2, S4].
Pay for recovery, monthly (step 3)keep, move to step 1Strongest need-and-mechanism case on the page; add the 2026 context [S28, S35].
"How to report" listkeep; soften "the hotline exists for uncertain tips" (Practice)The hotline says it exists for victims first [S18]; tips are reviewed but unmeasured [S9, S17].
Operator-change warningkeep, correct the dateAward 30 Sep 2025, handover 8 Dec 2025 [S22, S23]; policy text unchanged [S19–S21]; add that 41 AGs wanted more police sharing and survivor groups opposed it [S25–S27].
Sanctuary for Families, Restore NYC, GEMSkeep; say what each publishesRestore: 12-month outcomes [S41]; Sanctuary: service volumes, internal evaluation only [S39, S40]; GEMS: no outcome figures found [S42].
The Freedom FundkeepCounting rule confirmed [S43]; IDS/Praxis prevalence study exists [S45]; figures differ by period (37,026 vs 40,463) [S43, S44].
The Exodus Road, IJMdrop from the give list; explain in a noteNo independent evaluation read; model carries the raid critique (C); both are financially sound and well rated on paperwork (D7, D8), which is not the question.
GEMSkeep, but with a caveat or below the other twoFY2023 audit carried going-concern doubt; leadership changed Feb 2024; least outcome data of the three; recovered on paper in FY2025 (D5).
Sanctuary for Families, Restore NYCkeepClean checks; deficits but no flags (D3, D4).
The hotline's operator linekeep, expandCompass Connections is a federal child-shelter contractor with negative net assets and a two-star rating, and has not yet published its tip-sharing plan (D2).
Sextortion talkkeep, shorten, widenMatches FBI/NCMEC advice; no evaluation; evidence favours integration into broader programmes [S47].
Buy Fair Food tomatoesre-rank up as "back worker-driven enforcement"; drop the tomato instructionLabel scarce [S55, S56]; mechanism independently endorsed [S2, S50, S52].
BBBS mentoringkeep as optionalModest, real youth effects [S57, S58]; no trafficking evidence [S33].
January rhythm (Prevention Month)keepUnchanged.
"Sent this page to one person" checklist itemkeepNo evidence either way; zero cost.
New: policy actionaddSee B4.

---

C. How these actions land on the people affected, and what works in groups

C1. Survivors

C2. Migrant workers

C3. Sex workers

C4. Children and families

C5. Doing it with others: which group formats have evidence

FormatWhat was measuredResultGrade
Worker-driven enforcement (FFP, Milk with Dignity; workers trained, 24/7 complaint line, audits, buyer consequences)Complaints, resolutions, wages recovered, cases found; independent assessment of the mechanism3,919 complaints, 54% resolved in <2 weeks; no forced-labour cases on participating farms (programme's claim) [S48]; 611 violations resolved on dairy farms [S54]; mechanism endorsed by CBP 2021 and Re:Structure Lab [S50, S52]moderate (outcomes self-reported; mechanism independently endorsed)
Corporate supplier codes, social audits, certificationsDetection of forced labourRepeatedly failed; disasters at audited or certified sites [S52, S53]contradicted
Survivor-mentor peer support (My Life My Choice)Commercial sexual exploitation, drugs, arrests at 6 and 12 months72% → 24% → 14%; one group, n=41 [S33]weak-to-moderate (promising, uncontrolled)
Health-care provider trainingKnowledge, attitudes, confidenceImproved; identification of patients not measured in the reviews read [S10, S11, S76]weak
Health-care screening with a validated tool (RAFT)Sensitivity and specificity against a reference interview89–100% sensitivity, 61–74% specificity in 4,127 ED patients; no before/after identification count [S92]moderate as an instrument; unproven as a programme
Hotel staff trainingProperties trained; self-reported identifications11,000+ properties (BEST, 2019); "identifying more victims" is self-report; no peer-reviewed identification evaluation [S93]; three airline misidentification cases show the failure mode in a neighbouring sector [S12–S14, S95]weak
Trucker training (TAT)Calls and "potential victims identified"1.8 million trained, 1,200+ potential victims identified (own figures via news); no independent check [S94]weak
School-based prevention curriculaKnowledge, self-efficacy, self-reported sexual behaviourMLMC: one group, n=354, RR 0.52 for sexually explicit behaviour [S96]; Not a Number: quasi-experimental, N=449, awareness and help-seeking up [S97]; the first RCT with exploitation as the outcome completes September 2027 [S97]weak-to-moderate (promising; first real test pending)
Congregations, faith groupsNo evaluation found (search budget exhausted before this could be searched)unknownnot graded
Neighbourhood-watch or "community patrol" formatsNo evaluation found; harm cases documented (airlines; viral rumours; massage-parlour policing)harm without measured benefitcontradicted as commonly practised
Evidence-led local coalitions that correct myths (Minneapolis 2018 Super Bowl)Media coverageLocal coverage turned sceptical of the myth after a researcher–stakeholder strategy [S8]weak (one case, media outcome)
Migrant-worker organising (CIW, Migrant Justice, CDM's Contratados)Programme outputs; recruiter reviewsAs above for FFP/MwD; Contratados publishes no figures [S15]moderate for WSR; none for Contratados

For the pages. The group format with the best evidence is the one a reader can only join from outside: worker organisations. The honest group suggestion for a congregation, workplace or school is therefore not a "signs" training but (a) becoming a Fair Food sponsor or asking the institution's food service to buy from participating buyers, (b) funding legal aid together, and (c) if a training is wanted, picking one that measures identifications, not knowledge, and includes survivors in its design (Fraley 2020's finding on what sustains outcomes [S10]).

---

D. Organisations named on the pages

Filings are from ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer (IRS Form 990) unless stated; "CN" is Charity Navigator's score, stars and how many of its four "beacons" were assessed (Accountability & Finance; Impact & Measurement; Leadership & Planning; Culture & Compensation). A 1-of-4 rating grades finances and governance paperwork only. Candid seals are given where a page showed one. Everything in this section was read on 2026-11-05 by the organisation-check agent [agent] unless marked otherwise; I re-downloaded and confirmed the GEMS audit (S115) and the two ProPublica pages for Compass Connections and BCFS (S106). None of GiveWell, The Life You Can Save, Founders Pledge, Giving Green or Giving What We Can lists any of these organisations, with one stale exception (the Freedom Fund, below); Open Philanthropy's database now redirects to coefficientgiving.org, which blocked every query. [S68, S69, S105] Charity Commission (UK) and ACNC (Australia) registers were unreachable. Court-record searches for the four NYC organisations could not run (search budget), so "none found" for them is weaker than for the others.

1. Polaris (EIN 03-0391561). Operating: yes; no longer runs the hotline (handover complete 8 Dec 2025); CEO Megan Lundstrom since Feb 2025 after Catherine Chen left in Dec 2024; launched a workforce and economic-mobility initiative in Jul 2026. Filing: FY2024 (filed 14 Nov 2025) revenue $11,051,294, expenses $13,221,347, net assets −$140,648; its own 2024 annual report, which counts $6.0M of donated services the 990 excludes, gives revenue $17.3M, expenses $19.2M, the hotline 61% of spending, and 133 employees; deficits in 2023 and 2024. Ratings: CN 69%, two stars, 1 of 4 beacons (FY2024); Candid Platinum 2025. Controversy (Nov 2024–Nov 2026): the hotline award went elsewhere (A2); Senator Grassley's 5 May 2025 letter relayed whistleblower claims that two 2025 "high indicator" case files involving potential minors were closed "Work Not Required" without alerting police, and alleged a conflict of interest in that a Polaris co-founder directs the HHS office that funds the hotline (Just the News, 2 Jun 2025, added that she married Polaris's later executive director in 2013; HHS said awards follow "program policy and evaluation criteria"); the April 2025 letter of 41 attorneys general. No adjudication of the whistleblower claims was found; the practical outcome was the award to Compass. No layoffs reported anywhere read, though the hotline was 61% of spending. [S106–S108] Flag for the page: giving to Polaris no longer funds the hotline; its new programme has no outcome record yet.

2. Compass Connections (EIN 46-1394166), the hotline operator. Identity: a separate legal entity from BCFS Health and Human Services (EIN 74-1260710), not a rename; formed 2011; its board chair, Kevin Dinnin, is BCFS's president and CEO; its careers link goes to a BCFS page; the federal unaccompanied-children shelter business moved from BCFS to Compass between FY2022 and FY2023 (Compass revenue at most $352,191 a year through Aug 2022, then $192,341,732 in FY2023, $434,325,355 in FY2024 and $448,681,852 in FY2025; BCFS revenue fell from $4,436,163,982 in FY2021 to $28,615,731 in FY2025; BCFS's independent audit for FY2025 "identified: Material noncompliance. Audit identified a failure to follow requirements established by law, regulations, contract or grant agreements", per ProPublica's audit summary, re-downloaded and read in the main session; the underlying audit was not read). Compass FY2025: expenses $450,035,756 (confirmed in the main session), net assets −$4,749,686, 5,239 employees; programmes per its 990: residential shelter for children in federal custody (8,034 served), post-release services (4,001), and HHS's National Call Center for unaccompanied children; the hotline is a small addition. Ratings: CN 72%, two stars, 1 of 4 beacons (FY2025; "tax form disclosed on website: no"). History: BCFS ran the Tornillo tent camp (Jun 2018–Jan 2019; built for 400, held over 2,800 teenagers in Dec 2018; an HHS OIG memo faulted missing fingerprint checks for about 1,300 staff and "dangerously low" mental-health staffing) and was the subject of an HHS OIG audit of its FY2015 shelters (Dec 2018; late medical exams, 123 undocumented reunifications; BCFS said each item was addressed); Carrizo Springs 2019–2021. The research file's note that Compass ran the Fort Bliss site is unverified: the OIG's Fort Bliss report names no contractor and no source read places BCFS or Compass there. 2024–2026: a 15-year-old detained in a Nov 2025 ICE raid was held about four months at a Compass-run San Antonio shelter (News 4 San Antonio, Mar–May 2026); no lawsuit, audit or regulator action naming Compass was found; two Grassley letters to Compass (12 Dec 2025 on the hotline; another on ORR contractors) are unread (403). Policy: Compass has published no confidentiality or tip-sharing policy of its own; the hotline's posted text is Polaris's (A2); a North Dakota task-force summary of an HHS webinar (19 Dec 2025, secondary) says Compass is "developing a nationwide engagement plan to streamline how tips are shared", that "no call data is shared unless legally required or with consent", that advocates work on site in San Antonio, and that the full strategy rolls out in 2026. [S22, S24, S106, S109] Flag for the page: the trafficking hotline is now run by a federal child-custody shelter contractor with negative net assets and a two-star rating; say who runs it, and keep the January re-check of the confidentiality text.

3. Sanctuary for Families (EIN 13-3193119). Operating: yes (posts through Oct 2026; FY2025 990 and audit posted Jun 2026). Filing: FYE 30 Jun 2025, revenue $31,326,151, expenses $33,654,637, net assets $23,816,886; 333 employees; CEO compensation $324,350. Ratings: CN 97, four stars, 1 of 4 beacons (FY2024). Controversy: none found (no searches could run); a $2.3M deficit is a number, not misconduct. [S110]

4. Restore NYC (EIN 20-2390142). Operating: yes (FY2025 report; gala Oct 2026; 990 filed Aug 2026). Filing: FYE 30 Sep 2025, revenue $4,188,032, expenses $5,107,337, net assets $2,195,762; deficits of $523,253 (FY2024) and $919,305 (FY2025); auditor changed in FY2024. Ratings: CN 92, four stars, 1 of 4 beacons; Candid Platinum 2026 per its own badge. Controversy: none found (one search). [S111]

5. GEMS (EIN 13-4150972). Operating: filing yes (FYE Jun 2025 990 filed May 2026); website stale (© 2023; newest event Sep 2024; team page still lists the founder as CEO). Filing: FY2025 revenue $5,487,178 (99.9% contributions), expenses $2,558,086, net assets $3,100,591, after FY2024 revenue $2,238,292, expenses $3,152,152 and net assets of $171,499. Ratings: CN 65, two stars, 1 of 4 beacons. Controversy, primary and confirmed by me from the audit PDF: GEMS's FY2023 audited statements (10 May 2024) carry a "Substantial Doubt About the Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern" paragraph; Note 11 cites "loss of substantial funding, delayed payments from existing grants, and loss of key development staff", "additional losses totaling over $600,000 during FY24", and states that "in February of 2024, GEMS' long-term Executive Director stepped down and an interim CEO was hired." The FY2025 figures show a recovery on paper; later audits are not posted and current leadership could not be established. No misconduct found. [S112, S115] Flag for the page: the Do page names GEMS without caveat and GEMS publishes the least outcome data of the three; either say "survivor-founded, rebuilding after a 2024 funding crisis" or list it below the other two.

6. The Freedom Fund (EIN 30-0805768; UK company 08926428, charity 1158838). Operating: yes; CEO Havovi Wadia succeeds Nick Grono on 1 Dec 2026; second MacKenzie Scott gift Nov 2025. Filing: FY2024 (filed 6 Nov 2025) revenue $19,705,081, expenses $22,789,774, net assets $36,389,783; UK accounts to 31 Dec 2025 filed. Ratings: CN 100%, four stars, 1 of 4 beacons; Giving What We Can holds a 2016 research report (flagged by GWWC as no longer updated) that calls cost-effectiveness possibly "very high" but "significantly lower than the most cost-effective public health interventions", finds "$657 per slave liberated in India" "roughly plausible", and notes the absence of randomised evaluations. Controversy: none found. [S113] This is the only organisation on the pages with any evaluator write-up and with independent prevalence research (A4).

7. The Exodus Road (EIN 46-1384815). Operating: yes (operation reports to Oct 2026). Filing: FY2025 (filed 12 Jun 2026) revenue $6,862,146 (up 85% on 2024, unexplained on pages read), expenses $3,844,104, net assets $3,574,762. Ratings: CN 98%, four stars, 4 of 4 beacons; Candid Platinum 2026. Controversy: none in the window; in 2021 Global Observer reported a former investigator's allegations of assault and harassment at a 2017 staff retreat, and the organisation's own Feb 2021 release said an investigation "found incidents of inappropriate sexual humor". No independent evaluation of results found. [S114]

8. International Justice Mission (EIN 54-1722887). Operating: yes (FY Mar 2025 990 filed Jan 2026; ijm.org blocked). Filing: FYE 31 Mar 2025 revenue $129,931,939, expenses $111,722,536, net assets $58,214,201. Ratings: CN 97%, four stars, 1 of 4 beacons. Controversy: none in the window; Jul 2023 BBC Africa Eye alleged that Ghanaian children were wrongly taken in IJM-backed raids and that staff worked to rescue "quotas" (unread, BBC blocked); a Ghanaian MP asked the National Security Ministry to investigate (Starr FM, 12 Jul 2023, read). Its prevalence studies were not read today. [S116]

9. NCMEC (EIN 52-1328557). Operating: yes. Filing: FY2025 (filed 18 Jun 2026) revenue $66,813,108, expenses $62,756,502, net assets $83,655,346; 552 employees; government grants $50,280,968 (75% of revenue); CEO compensation $521,550. Ratings: CN four stars, 4 of 4 beacons (score reads 99% in the page layout; treat as likely). Critique, primary: Stanford Internet Observatory, 22 Apr 2024, from 66 interviews: the CyberTipline took 36,210,368 reports in 2023, "only 49% of all 2022 reports were actionable", officers "struggle to triage and prioritize", platforms file incomplete reports and memes, NCMEC "lacks sufficient technical staff" and loses staff to industry, and the problems "will be massively multiplied by the coming wave of unique, AI-generated CSAM"; NCMEC's response the same day called the recommendations "creative" and disputed nothing; Congress then passed the REPORT Act (P.L. 118-59, 7 May 2024: one-year retention, mandatory reporting of trafficking and enticement). Controversy in the window: in Feb 2025 DOJ, "our grantor", directed NCMEC to bring its public materials into line with an executive order on gender, and NCMEC removed references to transgender people (NBC, 7 Feb 2025); a Mar 2026 Grassley letter seeking unredacted CyberTipline data is unread. [S117] For the page: the CyberTipline is the statutory channel; there is no alternative, and the Stanford findings argue for reporting with specifics.

10. Coalition of Immokalee Workers (EIN 65-0641010) and Fair Food Standards Council (EIN 45-2982573). Operating: yes (CIW news to Oct 2026: nursery-worker initiative; Kroger and Publix named as holdouts; the Wendy's boycott "continues to this day"). Filing: CIW FY2024 revenue $4,069,362, expenses $3,136,409, net assets $7,310,559; FFSC FY2024 revenue $7,264,003 (from $1,158,670 in 2023), expenses $3,931,000, net assets $3,664,287. Ratings: CN 94%, four stars, 1 of 4 beacons for both; Candid Gold 2025 (CIW). Scope: FFSC's site says "as of 2025, the FFP is present in 22 states" while CIW says "23 states and counting"; keep both. Controversy: none found. [S118]

11. Big Brothers Big Sisters of New York City (EIN 13-5600383). Operating: yes (events to Dec 2026). Filing: FYE 30 Jun 2025 revenue $9,266,911, expenses $10,956,230, net assets $7,838,522; deficits of $1.3M, $1.7M and $1.7M over FY2023–FY2025; net assets down from $12,527,466 (FY2022). Ratings: CN 91, four stars, 1 of 4 beacons (FY2025). Controversy: none; a CEO change in Aug 2024 (Alicia Guevara out; Andrew Lipman interim; Michael Coughlin now executive director) with no reason given. [S119]

12. Walk Free / Minderoo Foundation (Perth; Minderoo Foundation Limited, ACN 651 422 141, trustee of the Minderoo Foundation Trust, ABN 24 819 440 618). Operating: yes; the latest Global Slavery Index is the 2023 edition and no next edition is announced. Methodology critiques: Gallagher 2017 (Anti-Trafficking Review 8: "the conspicuous lack of critical engagement with the Index"; "metrics-focused strategic philanthropy"); Guth et al. 2014 ("significant and critical weaknesses" in methods, replicability and validity); Walby & Francis 2024 (Social Indicators Research) on the joint ILO/Walk Free/IOM estimates: "experimental and tentative, rather than robust", with their own re-estimate "more than 30% larger". Minderoo: about 100 of roughly 350 roles cut or changed in Apr 2024; the Forrests stepped down as co-chairs in Oct 2024 (remain directors); no 2024–2026 lawsuit or regulator action found. Australian filings unreachable. [S120] For the page: the 49.6 million figure is a modelled, contested estimate; the Learn page already says "modelled"; add "contested" with the Walby & Francis citation.

13. ILO and IOM. No new edition of the Global Estimates after the 2022 edition (2021 data); the ILO posted a methodology companion dated 9 Oct 2025; its forced-labour page still cites the 2022 figures. [S121]

14. Not on the pages, and why they should stay off.

Stronger-evidence organisations doing the same job. For survivor services in New York: none with an independent evaluation; Restore NYC publishes the most outcome tracking, Sanctuary for Families the largest service volume and legal-aid capacity. For global anti-slavery giving: the Freedom Fund is the only one here with independent prevalence research and an evaluator write-up (stale), and it also funds the Re:Structure Lab work cited in A6, which should be disclosed where that work is cited. For investigations-and-rescue (TER, IJM): no organisation of that type has an independent outcome evaluation that anyone in this session could read; the worker-driven and survivor-service routes have the better external scrutiny. For the hotline and CyberTipline: statutory channels; no alternative exists. For hotline-adjacent policy (consent, no mandatory tipline): the National Survivor Network and Freedom Network USA are the survivor-led and coalition voices the pages can cite.

Other organisations relied on in this review (not on the pages): National Survivor Network and Freedom Network USA, operating, positions as cited [S26–S28, S60]; Centro de los Derechos del Migrante (Contratados), operating, no figures [S15]; Migrant Justice / Milk with Dignity, operating, own figures [S54].

---

E. Time: what goes stale, and when

---

F. Sources

All fetched 2026-11-05 unless stated. "Local extract" means the PDF was downloaded with curl and read with pdftotext.

Sources found by the awareness/hotline agent (all fetched 2026-11-05 by that agent; S78, S86 and S87 were re-downloaded with curl in the main session and the quoted figures and phrases confirmed; the rest are as the agent reported them)

G. Sources found by the organisation-check agent (all read 2026-11-05 by that agent unless marked; S106 and S115 re-downloaded and confirmed in the main session)

What would overturn the main conclusions

Contest a fact, suggest something, or tell us what’s broken

If someone is in danger right now, don’t use this form. Call your local emergency number (911 in the US). For trafficking: 1-888-373-7888, or text 233733.

What is it?

No name, no account. Your note goes into the site’s private records, nothing about your browser or connection is stored with it, and the email box is the only way we’d know who you are. The weekly review reads every note, re-reads the original source, and fixes the page if it should. A contested fact and its outcome are listed on Contested, in the review’s words, never yours.

No tracking on any link.Ticks stay on this device.What changedContested